Welcome to a world without rulesIt’s been almost 2 weeks since I went to see this summer’s long awaited (and much hyped) sequel – The Dark Knight.
Here’s something about me…I usually give a film a couple of days to sort of sink in and then I make an attempt to recall my memories (if there are any), piece them back together, and try to come up with a an adequate review of the feature.
First of all, let’s get something out of the way before we start dissecting this film. The late Heath Ledger did a phenomenal job as the deranged and psychotic Joker. I’ve got nothing but praise for him. I had heard that he was great, but his performance exceeded my expectations in every which way, earning him a place in my top 10 ultimate movie villains list. Truly an Oscar worthy performance!!
But did the film (Heath Ledger’s Joker aside) live up to its hype? After contemplating over this for quite some time, I would conclude that yes it did, however, it wasn’t as great as I had hoped it would be (I think the hype got the best of me). Why do I say that? I say this because I truly believe that without Heath Ledger’s Joker, this movie would have been merely another summer-blockbuster-comic-book-flick. This is why…
Gotham City. This time I didn’t enjoy Gotham as much I enjoyed it in Batman Begins. Gotham City, which was filmed in Chicago, Illinois, was just too much…Chicago for me. The feel of a dark and gritty metropolis infested with crime was…gone. No vaulted arches, no gargoyles, no rain. Instead we got plenty (and perhaps too much) daylight to make Gotham look like a beautiful place. Just like the good ol’ Chicago with all its glory.
152 min. I did not care for the 2 and a half hour length of the feature. It could have easily been edited into 2 hours. Just take out the over the top (and unnecessary) Hong Kong sequences, and the brief Scarecrow cameo, which led us nowhere.
Two-face. Not only that his face looked a little cheesy and computer animated (I was hoping for something more "real", something along the lines of a napalm victim from We Were Soldiers), but the real bummer is that Two-face is in the film for no more than 20 minutes which after he gets what I call the “Venom treatment” (those who have seen Spider-Man 3 will understand). WTF?
Sal Maroni. I also didn’t care for Eric Roberts as the mob boss Sal “The Boss” Maroni, please, the guy looks more like an abusive husband rather than a mafia don. Roberts’ performance is incomparable with Tom Wilkinson’s Carmine Falcone from Batman Begins.
Batman. Yes…the Batman…well…let me put it this way – where in Batman Begins our hero is portrayed more like a ninja who appears from the dark, kicks some serious ass and then all of a sudden disappears, leaving everyone (including the audience) a little frightened, then in the Dark Knight he isn’t as frightening (whatever happened to the comic book Batman who intimidated his enemies?) as I would have liked to see him. He was solid, but not as great as I had expected him to be.
All this considered I must say that Heath Ledger stole the show and made the Dark Knight truly enjoyable . He basically made up for every shortcoming of this film. This time the joke was on the knight…

* * * * (four out of five) – a must see not only of this summer but of this entire year. And if you don’t care for the genre, you should see it for Ledger’s performance.
V.
Enjoyed The Dark Knight? Viira recommends: Batman Begins, The Prestige, Sin City
Poster courtesy of http://www.impawards.com/